🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.